Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames

Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames

This is a continuation of the previous changes titled:

   Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
   Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename

There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was
previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it
doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs
to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number
than ours).

So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or:

1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send
   root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered);
2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and
   exists only in the send root).

Reproducer for case 1)

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
    $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/x
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/y

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

    $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
    $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

Simple reproducer for case 2)

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c
    $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/e

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

    $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/h
    $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2
    $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

Another simple reproducer for case 2)

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2
    $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2
    $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

More complex reproducer for case 2)

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
    $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
    $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/x
    $ mkdir /mnt/a/y

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

    $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
    $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
    $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c

    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building
path strings.

While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect
when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several
specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple
detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop
detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as
the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed).

Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>