From 00d689169dd088257de7ed218ff2c638bc5ad3b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:47:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mfd: max77686: Use a generic name for the PMIC node in the example The ePAPR standard says that: "the name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model." So, change the max77686 binding document example to use a generic node name instead of using the chip's name. Suggested-by: Sergei Shtylyov Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas Signed-off-by: Lee Jones --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt index 8221102d3fc2..d2ed3c20a5c3 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77686.txt @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ to get matched with their hardware counterparts as follow: Example: - max77686@09 { + max77686: pmic@09 { compatible = "maxim,max77686"; interrupt-parent = <&wakeup_eint>; interrupts = <26 0>; -- 2.39.2