From 01839f6ddef011878e905d72786d95cee21ca039 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Cox Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:25:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] libata-sff: Correct use of check_status() ata_check_status() does an SFF compliant check ata_chk_status() does a generic call to ap->ops->check_status (usually ata_check_status) libata-sff uses the wrong one. Hardly suprising given the naming here, which ought to get fixed to ata_sff_check_status() perhaps ? Signed-off-by: Alan Cox Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/libata-sff.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c index 026439e05afe..1232dcb6008d 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sff.c @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ void ata_tf_read(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_taskfile *tf) { struct ata_ioports *ioaddr = &ap->ioaddr; - tf->command = ata_check_status(ap); + tf->command = ata_chk_status(ap); tf->feature = ioread8(ioaddr->error_addr); tf->nsect = ioread8(ioaddr->nsect_addr); tf->lbal = ioread8(ioaddr->lbal_addr); -- 2.39.5