From 04571ac9c081610991d2d03f7758cb534cda23a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Rientjes Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 10:37:08 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] mm, memcg: don't take task_lock in task_in_mem_cgroup For processes that have detached their mm's, task_in_mem_cgroup() unnecessarily takes task_lock() when rcu_read_lock() is all that is necessary to call mem_cgroup_from_task(). While we're here, switch task_in_mem_cgroup() to return bool. Signed-off-by: David Rientjes Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 9 +++++---- mm/memcontrol.c | 11 ++++++----- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index d6183f06d8c1..7b4d9d79570b 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page); bool __mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(const struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg, struct mem_cgroup *memcg); -int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg); +bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, + const struct mem_cgroup *memcg); extern struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_page(struct page *page); extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p); @@ -273,10 +274,10 @@ static inline bool mm_match_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm, return true; } -static inline int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, - const struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +static inline bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, + const struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { - return 1; + return true; } static inline struct cgroup_subsys_state diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 010d6c14129a..caff46388129 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1450,11 +1450,12 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_same_or_subtree(const struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg, return ret; } -int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +bool task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, + const struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { - int ret; struct mem_cgroup *curr = NULL; struct task_struct *p; + bool ret; p = find_lock_task_mm(task); if (p) { @@ -1466,14 +1467,14 @@ int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *memcg) * killer still needs to detect if they have already been oom * killed to prevent needlessly killing additional tasks. */ - task_lock(task); + rcu_read_lock(); curr = mem_cgroup_from_task(task); if (curr) css_get(&curr->css); - task_unlock(task); + rcu_read_unlock(); } if (!curr) - return 0; + return false; /* * We should check use_hierarchy of "memcg" not "curr". Because checking * use_hierarchy of "curr" here make this function true if hierarchy is -- 2.39.5