From 06c74870973dff9bab05bec510cec74ba80c26c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Stephen M. Cameron" Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:15:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] cciss: fix incorrect scsi status reporting commit b0cf0b118c90477d1a6811f2cd2307f6a5578362 upstream. Delete code which sets SCSI status incorrectly as it's already been set correctly above this incorrect code. The bug was introduced in 2009 by commit b0e15f6db111 ("cciss: fix typo that causes scsi status to be lost.") Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron Reported-by: Roel van Meer Tested-by: Roel van Meer Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c | 11 +---------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c b/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c index a552cab85a21..3796fcc1a450 100644 --- a/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c +++ b/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c @@ -763,16 +763,7 @@ static void complete_scsi_command(CommandList_struct *c, int timeout, { case CMD_TARGET_STATUS: /* Pass it up to the upper layers... */ - if( ei->ScsiStatus) - { -#if 0 - printk(KERN_WARNING "cciss: cmd %p " - "has SCSI Status = %x\n", - c, ei->ScsiStatus); -#endif - cmd->result |= (ei->ScsiStatus << 1); - } - else { /* scsi status is zero??? How??? */ + if (!ei->ScsiStatus) { /* Ordinarily, this case should never happen, but there is a bug in some released firmware revisions that allows it to happen -- 2.39.5