From 0fff6a18e30e7c22791cf5f5d77808ebc7d2265f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:58:18 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] x86 numa: don't check if node is NUMA_NO_NODE

If we aren't debugging per_cpu maps, the cpu's node is stored in per_cpu
variable numa_node.  If `node' is NUMA_NO_NODE, it means the caller wants
to clear the cpu's node.  So we should also call set_cpu_numa_node() in
this case.

Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 2d125be1bae9..21d02f0d7a2c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ void __cpuinit numa_set_node(int cpu, int node)
 #endif
 	per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_node_map, cpu) = node;
 
-	if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
-		set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node);
+	set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node);
 }
 
 void __cpuinit numa_clear_node(int cpu)
-- 
2.39.5