From 1077c932db63ecc571c31df1c24d4a44e30928e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:57:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86, CPU, AMD: Drop useless label All we want to do is return from this function so stop jumping around like a flea for no good reason. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1365436666-9837-5-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c index cea02d703bca..5013a48d1aff 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c @@ -192,11 +192,11 @@ static void __cpuinit amd_k7_smp_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) /* Athlon 660/661 is valid. */ if ((c->x86_model == 6) && ((c->x86_mask == 0) || (c->x86_mask == 1))) - goto valid_k7; + return; /* Duron 670 is valid */ if ((c->x86_model == 7) && (c->x86_mask == 0)) - goto valid_k7; + return; /* * Athlon 662, Duron 671, and Athlon >model 7 have capability @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static void __cpuinit amd_k7_smp_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) ((c->x86_model == 7) && (c->x86_mask >= 1)) || (c->x86_model > 7)) if (cpu_has_mp) - goto valid_k7; + return; /* If we get here, not a certified SMP capable AMD system. */ @@ -220,9 +220,6 @@ static void __cpuinit amd_k7_smp_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) WARN_ONCE(1, "WARNING: This combination of AMD" " processors is not suitable for SMP.\n"); add_taint(TAINT_UNSAFE_SMP, LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE); - -valid_k7: - ; } static void __cpuinit init_amd_k7(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) -- 2.39.5