From 18dafac1a4c6c88867a50f9a82492976f20383d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiro SEKIBA Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:49:45 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: deleted inconsistent comment in nilfs_load_inode_block() The comment says, "Caller of this function MUST lock s_inode_lock", however just above the comment, it locks s_inode_lock in the function. Signed-off-by: Jiro SEKIBA Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi --- fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c index 5040220c3732..2a0a5a3ac134 100644 --- a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c +++ b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c @@ -664,7 +664,6 @@ int nilfs_load_inode_block(struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi, struct inode *inode, int err; spin_lock(&sbi->s_inode_lock); - /* Caller of this function MUST lock s_inode_lock */ if (ii->i_bh == NULL) { spin_unlock(&sbi->s_inode_lock); err = nilfs_ifile_get_inode_block(sbi->s_ifile, inode->i_ino, -- 2.39.5