From 19e274630c9e23a84d5940af83cf5db35103f968 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:47:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] job control: reorganize wait_task_stopped() wait_task_stopped() tested task_stopped_code() without acquiring siglock and, if stop condition existed, called wait_task_stopped() and directly returned the result. This patch moves the initial task_stopped_code() testing into wait_task_stopped() and make wait_consider_task() fall through to wait_task_continue() on 0 return. This is for the following two reasons. * Because the initial task_stopped_code() test is done without acquiring siglock, it may race against SIGCONT generation. The stopped condition might have been replaced by continued state by the time wait_task_stopped() acquired siglock. This may lead to unexpected failure of WNOHANG waits. This reorganization addresses this single race case but there are other cases - TASK_RUNNING -> TASK_STOPPED transition and EXIT_* transitions. * Scheduled ptrace updates require changes to the initial test which would fit better inside wait_task_stopped(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov --- kernel/exit.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 5cbc83e83a5d..33837936b98c 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -1377,11 +1377,23 @@ static int *task_stopped_code(struct task_struct *p, bool ptrace) return NULL; } -/* - * Handle sys_wait4 work for one task in state TASK_STOPPED. We hold - * read_lock(&tasklist_lock) on entry. If we return zero, we still hold - * the lock and this task is uninteresting. If we return nonzero, we have - * released the lock and the system call should return. +/** + * wait_task_stopped - Wait for %TASK_STOPPED or %TASK_TRACED + * @wo: wait options + * @ptrace: is the wait for ptrace + * @p: task to wait for + * + * Handle sys_wait4() work for %p in state %TASK_STOPPED or %TASK_TRACED. + * + * CONTEXT: + * read_lock(&tasklist_lock), which is released if return value is + * non-zero. Also, grabs and releases @p->sighand->siglock. + * + * RETURNS: + * 0 if wait condition didn't exist and search for other wait conditions + * should continue. Non-zero return, -errno on failure and @p's pid on + * success, implies that tasklist_lock is released and wait condition + * search should terminate. */ static int wait_task_stopped(struct wait_opts *wo, int ptrace, struct task_struct *p) @@ -1397,6 +1409,9 @@ static int wait_task_stopped(struct wait_opts *wo, if (!ptrace && !(wo->wo_flags & WUNTRACED)) return 0; + if (!task_stopped_code(p, ptrace)) + return 0; + exit_code = 0; spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock); @@ -1607,8 +1622,9 @@ static int wait_consider_task(struct wait_opts *wo, int ptrace, * Wait for stopped. Depending on @ptrace, different stopped state * is used and the two don't interact with each other. */ - if (task_stopped_code(p, ptrace)) - return wait_task_stopped(wo, ptrace, p); + ret = wait_task_stopped(wo, ptrace, p); + if (ret) + return ret; /* * Wait for continued. There's only one continued state and the -- 2.39.5