From 1bbf0b8d606645c7596ee641acfbf042765c9719 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Becker Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:42:08 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: ocfs2_rotate_tree_right() doesn't need struct inode. We don't need struct inode in ocfs2_rotate_tree_right() anymore. Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c index 072f7fe5407..93f02a11302 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c @@ -2308,7 +2308,7 @@ static int ocfs2_leftmost_rec_contains(struct ocfs2_extent_list *el, u32 cpos) * *ret_left_path will contain a valid path which can be passed to * ocfs2_insert_path(). */ -static int ocfs2_rotate_tree_right(struct inode *inode, handle_t *handle, +static int ocfs2_rotate_tree_right(handle_t *handle, struct ocfs2_extent_tree *et, enum ocfs2_split_type split, u32 insert_cpos, @@ -4254,7 +4254,7 @@ static int ocfs2_do_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, * can wind up skipping both of these two special cases... */ if (rotate) { - ret = ocfs2_rotate_tree_right(inode, handle, et, type->ins_split, + ret = ocfs2_rotate_tree_right(handle, et, type->ins_split, le32_to_cpu(insert_rec->e_cpos), right_path, &left_path); if (ret) { -- 2.39.2