From 1d4457f99928a968767f6405b4a1f50845aa15fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kees Cook Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:23:46 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] sched: move no_new_privs into new atomic flags Since seccomp transitions between threads requires updates to the no_new_privs flag to be atomic, the flag must be part of an atomic flag set. This moves the nnp flag into a separate task field, and introduces accessors. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski --- fs/exec.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/sched.h | 18 +++++++++++++++--- kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +- kernel/sys.c | 4 ++-- security/apparmor/domain.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index a3d33fe592d6..0f5c272410f6 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static void check_unsafe_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm) * This isn't strictly necessary, but it makes it harder for LSMs to * mess up. */ - if (current->no_new_privs) + if (task_no_new_privs(current)) bprm->unsafe |= LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS; t = p; @@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ int prepare_binprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm) bprm->cred->egid = current_egid(); if (!(bprm->file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOSUID) && - !current->no_new_privs && + !task_no_new_privs(current) && kuid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_uid) && kgid_has_mapping(bprm->cred->user_ns, inode->i_gid)) { /* Set-uid? */ diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 306f4f0c987a..0fd19055bb64 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1307,13 +1307,12 @@ struct task_struct { * execve */ unsigned in_iowait:1; - /* task may not gain privileges */ - unsigned no_new_privs:1; - /* Revert to default priority/policy when forking */ unsigned sched_reset_on_fork:1; unsigned sched_contributes_to_load:1; + unsigned long atomic_flags; /* Flags needing atomic access. */ + pid_t pid; pid_t tgid; @@ -1967,6 +1966,19 @@ static inline void memalloc_noio_restore(unsigned int flags) current->flags = (current->flags & ~PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO) | flags; } +/* Per-process atomic flags. */ +#define PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS 0x00000001 /* May not gain new privileges. */ + +static inline bool task_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p) +{ + return test_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->atomic_flags); +} + +static inline void task_set_no_new_privs(struct task_struct *p) +{ + set_bit(PFA_NO_NEW_PRIVS, &p->atomic_flags); +} + /* * task->jobctl flags */ diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index f0652578af75..d2596136b0d1 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static long seccomp_attach_filter(struct sock_fprog *fprog) * This avoids scenarios where unprivileged tasks can affect the * behavior of privileged children. */ - if (!current->no_new_privs && + if (!task_no_new_privs(current) && security_capable_noaudit(current_cred(), current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN) != 0) return -EACCES; diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c index 66a751ebf9d9..ce8129192a26 100644 --- a/kernel/sys.c +++ b/kernel/sys.c @@ -1990,12 +1990,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, arg2, unsigned long, arg3, if (arg2 != 1 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5) return -EINVAL; - current->no_new_privs = 1; + task_set_no_new_privs(current); break; case PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS: if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5) return -EINVAL; - return current->no_new_privs ? 1 : 0; + return task_no_new_privs(current) ? 1 : 0; case PR_GET_THP_DISABLE: if (arg2 || arg3 || arg4 || arg5) return -EINVAL; diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c index 452567d3a08e..d97cba3e3849 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/domain.c +++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, bool permtest) * There is no exception for unconfined as change_hat is not * available. */ - if (current->no_new_privs) + if (task_no_new_privs(current)) return -EPERM; /* released below */ @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ int aa_change_profile(const char *ns_name, const char *hname, bool onexec, * no_new_privs is set because this aways results in a reduction * of permissions. */ - if (current->no_new_privs && !unconfined(profile)) { + if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(profile)) { put_cred(cred); return -EPERM; } -- 2.39.5