From 2926620145095ffb0350b2312ac9d0af8537796f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:39:02 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] dcache.c: call ->d_prune() regardless of d_unhashed() the only in-tree instance checks d_unhashed() anyway, out-of-tree code can preserve the current behaviour by adding such check if they want it and we get an ability to use it in cases where we *want* to be notified of killing being inevitable before ->d_lock is dropped, whether it's unhashed or not. In particular, autofs would benefit from that. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/dcache.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c index d8a77b1c3d52..21eee4c08e76 100644 --- a/fs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/dcache.c @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static void __dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry) * inform the fs via d_prune that this dentry is about to be * unhashed and destroyed. */ - if ((dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_PRUNE) && !d_unhashed(dentry)) + if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_PRUNE) dentry->d_op->d_prune(dentry); if (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_LRU_LIST) { -- 2.39.5