From 2e1cc3a5d7efa42d3aa4aaa77b9b2c3a51bb6073 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:34:27 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: No need to check for has_target() Either we can be setpolicy or target type, nothing else. And so the else part of setpolicy will automatically be of has_target() type. And so we don't need to check it again. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index faffdaaba343..1454ab3f0023 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static int cpufreq_parse_governor(char *str_governor, unsigned int *policy, *policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE; err = 0; } - } else if (has_target()) { + } else { struct cpufreq_governor *t; mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex); -- 2.39.2