From 2f12163369562146699bb156d26975991d465edd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiayi Ye Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 20:06:59 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8192u: delete successive assignments to the same location Successive assignments to the same location is meaningless and can be deleted. The Coccinelle semantic patch was used to find cases. @@ expression e1,e2,e3; @@ ( (<+...e1++...+>)=e2; | (<+...e1--...+>)=e2; | (<+...++e1...+>)=e2; | (<+...--e1...+>)=e2; | e1=e2; e1 = <+...e1...+>; | *e1=e2; *e1=e3; ) Signed-off-by: Jiayi Ye Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c index cf4d3dc5dc76..936565d46014 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c @@ -1476,14 +1476,12 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_TSSI(struct net_device *dev, bool bInCH14) rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter1, bMaskHWord, TempVal); //Write 0xa24 ~ 0xa27 - TempVal = 0; TempVal = priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[2] + (priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[3]<<8) + (priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[4]<<16)+ (priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[5]<<24); rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter2, bMaskDWord, TempVal); //Write 0xa28 0xa29 - TempVal = 0; TempVal = priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[6] + (priv->cck_txbbgain_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[7]<<8) ; @@ -1496,14 +1494,12 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_TSSI(struct net_device *dev, bool bInCH14) rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter1, bMaskHWord, TempVal); //Write 0xa24 ~ 0xa27 - TempVal = 0; TempVal = priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[2] + (priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[3]<<8) + (priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[4]<<16)+ (priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[5]<<24); rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, rCCK0_TxFilter2, bMaskDWord, TempVal); //Write 0xa28 0xa29 - TempVal = 0; TempVal = priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[6] + (priv->cck_txbbgain_ch14_table[priv->cck_present_attentuation].ccktxbb_valuearray[7]<<8) ; @@ -1528,7 +1524,6 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev, bool bInCH RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "CCK not chnl 14, reg 0x%x = 0x%x\n", rCCK0_TxFilter1, TempVal); //Write 0xa24 ~ 0xa27 - TempVal = 0; TempVal = CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][2] + (CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][3]<<8) + (CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][4]<<16)+ @@ -1537,7 +1532,6 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev, bool bInCH RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "CCK not chnl 14, reg 0x%x = 0x%x\n", rCCK0_TxFilter2, TempVal); //Write 0xa28 0xa29 - TempVal = 0; TempVal = CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][6] + (CCKSwingTable_Ch1_Ch13[priv->CCK_index][7]<<8) ; @@ -1556,7 +1550,6 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev, bool bInCH RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "CCK chnl 14, reg 0x%x = 0x%x\n", rCCK0_TxFilter1, TempVal); //Write 0xa24 ~ 0xa27 - TempVal = 0; TempVal = CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][2] + (CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][3]<<8) + (CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][4]<<16)+ @@ -1565,7 +1558,6 @@ static void dm_CCKTxPowerAdjust_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev, bool bInCH RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "CCK chnl 14, reg 0x%x = 0x%x\n", rCCK0_TxFilter2, TempVal); //Write 0xa28 0xa29 - TempVal = 0; TempVal = CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][6] + (CCKSwingTable_Ch14[priv->CCK_index][7]<<8) ; -- 2.39.5