From 33e57a8e59504540ad5a6070dd1b70493cc68024 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arjan van de Ven Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:45:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] x86-64: Mark rdtsc as sync only for netburst, not for core2 On the Core2 cpus, the rdtsc instruction is not serializing (as defined in the architecture reference since rdtsc exists) and due to the deep speculation of these cores, it's possible that you can observe time go backwards between cores due to this speculation. Since the kernel already deals with this with the SYNC_RDTSC flag, the solution is simple, only assume that the instruction is serializing on family 15... The price one pays for this is a slightly slower gettimeofday (by a dozen or two cycles), but that increase is quite small to pay for a really-going-forward tsc counter. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Chris Wright --- arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c index fc944b5e8f4a..013539fa53f0 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c @@ -854,7 +854,10 @@ static void __cpuinit init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) set_bit(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, &c->x86_capability); if (c->x86 == 6) set_bit(X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD, &c->x86_capability); - set_bit(X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC, &c->x86_capability); + if (c->x86 == 15) + set_bit(X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC, &c->x86_capability); + else + clear_bit(X86_FEATURE_SYNC_RDTSC, &c->x86_capability); c->x86_max_cores = intel_num_cpu_cores(c); srat_detect_node(); -- 2.39.5