From 36fddebaa8a9186d4f5817ab798a83400b2fb2e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Paris Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:24:23 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] fsnotify: initialize the group->num_marks in a better place Currently the comments say that group->num_marks is held because the group is on the fsnotify_group list. This isn't strictly the case, we really just hold the num_marks for the life of the group (any time group->refcnt is != 0) This patch moves the initialization stuff and makes it clear when it is really being held. Signed-off-by: Eric Paris --- fs/notify/group.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/notify/group.c b/fs/notify/group.c index c80809745312..656c534ffb66 100644 --- a/fs/notify/group.c +++ b/fs/notify/group.c @@ -82,9 +82,6 @@ static void fsnotify_add_group(struct fsnotify_group *group) BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&fsnotify_grp_mutex)); group->on_inode_group_list = 1; - /* being on the fsnotify_groups list holds one num_marks */ - atomic_inc(&group->num_marks); - list_add_tail_rcu(&group->inode_group_list, &fsnotify_inode_groups); } @@ -183,7 +180,14 @@ struct fsnotify_group *fsnotify_alloc_group(const struct fsnotify_ops *ops) if (!group) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + /* set to 0 when there a no external references to this group */ atomic_set(&group->refcnt, 1); + /* + * hits 0 when there are no external references AND no marks for + * this group + */ + atomic_set(&group->num_marks, 1); + mutex_init(&group->notification_mutex); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->notification_list); -- 2.39.5