From 37e7b5f1535dddaace865b25df34a2d049a3a66f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:08:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] cpumask: alloc_cpumask_var() use NUMA_NO_NODE

NUMA_NO_NODE and numa_node_id() have different meanings.  NUMA_NO_NODE is
obviously the recommended fallback.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 lib/cpumask.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
index 4f6425d7723..af3e5817de9 100644
--- a/lib/cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(zalloc_cpumask_var_node);
  */
 bool alloc_cpumask_var(cpumask_var_t *mask, gfp_t flags)
 {
-	return alloc_cpumask_var_node(mask, flags, numa_node_id());
+	return alloc_cpumask_var_node(mask, flags, NUMA_NO_NODE);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_cpumask_var);
 
-- 
2.39.5