From 3c13b680ce210313c6f7ad163435b62979958c09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lars Ellenberg Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:10:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drbd: only wakeup if something changed in update_peer_seq This commit got it wrong: drbd: Make the peer_seq updating code more obvious Make it more clear that update_peer_seq() is supposed to wake up the seq_wait queue whenever the sequence number changes. We don't need to wake up everytime we receive a sequence number that is _different_ from our currently stored "newest" sequence number, but only if we receive a sequence number _newer_ than what we already have, when we actually change mdev->peer_seq. Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg --- drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c index e44bf3c25718..cd78ebfefe52 100644 --- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c +++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c @@ -1734,14 +1734,15 @@ static bool need_peer_seq(struct drbd_conf *mdev) static void update_peer_seq(struct drbd_conf *mdev, unsigned int peer_seq) { - unsigned int old_peer_seq; + unsigned int newest_peer_seq; if (need_peer_seq(mdev)) { spin_lock(&mdev->peer_seq_lock); - old_peer_seq = mdev->peer_seq; - mdev->peer_seq = seq_max(mdev->peer_seq, peer_seq); + newest_peer_seq = seq_max(mdev->peer_seq, peer_seq); + mdev->peer_seq = newest_peer_seq; spin_unlock(&mdev->peer_seq_lock); - if (old_peer_seq != peer_seq) + /* wake up only if we actually changed mdev->peer_seq */ + if (peer_seq == newest_peer_seq) wake_up(&mdev->seq_wait); } } -- 2.39.2