From 3e40ea5486685d845baa5c4c3d6e8a7100c29d94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Fleming Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:51:50 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] score: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask() As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is pending in the shared queue. Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f ("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked") which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code across architectures. In the past some architectures got this code wrong, so using this helper function should stop that from happening again. Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Chen Liqin Cc: Lennox Wu Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- arch/score/kernel/signal.c | 15 +++------------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/score/kernel/signal.c b/arch/score/kernel/signal.c index bf9e33e05334..5a5bd1763336 100644 --- a/arch/score/kernel/signal.c +++ b/arch/score/kernel/signal.c @@ -159,10 +159,7 @@ score_rt_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs) goto badframe; sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE); - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - current->blocked = set; - recalc_sigpending(); - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); + set_current_blocked(&set); sig = restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->rs_uc.uc_mcontext); if (sig < 0) @@ -272,14 +269,8 @@ static int handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, */ ret = setup_rt_frame(ka, regs, sig, oldset, info); - if (ret == 0) { - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - sigorsets(¤t->blocked, ¤t->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask); - if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) - sigaddset(¤t->blocked, sig); - recalc_sigpending(); - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); - } + if (ret == 0) + block_sigmask(ka, sig); return ret; } -- 2.39.5