From 3e87d9a3dee0ad5416c3fb599a6019a24bfe6e64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:49:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] usb: musb: core: use ->resume instead ->resume_noirq In commit 0ec8fd70fb ("USB: musb: fix possible panic while resuming") musb_resume() became musb_resume_early() in order to enable the clocks early on resume. This piece of the resume code was removed later in commit 034917612 ("usb: musb: move clock handling to glue layer"). In between the function was renamed from musb_resume_early() to musb_resume_noirq() by commit commit 48fea9659e ("USB: Rework musb suspend()/resume_early()"). Now I see that first musb_core is resumed followed by phy and glue layer and I ask myself is this really what we intend to do? This kind of revoked the purpose of the first commit (0ec8fd70fb). Because of this and because it looks wrong to resume (core) before the glue layer I push it to the ->resume callback. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi --- drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c index 55ebd4b1daac..e46e295a383a 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c @@ -2297,7 +2297,7 @@ static int musb_suspend(struct device *dev) return 0; } -static int musb_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) +static int musb_resume(struct device *dev) { struct musb *musb = dev_to_musb(dev); @@ -2348,7 +2348,7 @@ static int musb_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) static const struct dev_pm_ops musb_dev_pm_ops = { .suspend = musb_suspend, - .resume_noirq = musb_resume_noirq, + .resume = musb_resume, .runtime_suspend = musb_runtime_suspend, .runtime_resume = musb_runtime_resume, }; -- 2.39.5