From 41471e8341a6b476bcd8ecc765a8b297c22a74f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Mason Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:08:30 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: Remove bogus max_sector warnings from the extent_io code It was testing the bio before doing logical->physical mapping, so the test was always wrong. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 21597bea21fd..a984a7bc1197 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -1702,7 +1702,6 @@ extent_bio_alloc(struct block_device *bdev, u64 first_sector, int nr_vecs, static int submit_one_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio, int mirror_num) { - u64 maxsector; int ret = 0; struct bio_vec *bvec = bio->bi_io_vec + bio->bi_vcnt - 1; struct page *page = bvec->bv_page; @@ -1730,12 +1729,6 @@ static int submit_one_bio(int rw, struct bio *bio, int mirror_num) bio_get(bio); - maxsector = bio->bi_bdev->bd_inode->i_size >> 9; - if (maxsector < bio->bi_sector) { - printk("sector too large max %Lu got %llu\n", maxsector, - (unsigned long long)bio->bi_sector); - WARN_ON(1); - } if (tree->ops && tree->ops->submit_bio_hook) tree->ops->submit_bio_hook(page->mapping->host, rw, bio, mirror_num); -- 2.39.5