From 41b21aebe6a9c06e0b906f14bcab7c49b9b72d7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Niels de Vos Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:07:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: DSS2: OMAPFB: make DBG() more resistant in if-else constructions When DBG() is used in a simple if-else, the resulting code path currently depends on the definition of DBG(). Inserting the statement in a "do { ... } while (0)" prevents this possible misuse. Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos [tomi.valkeinen@ti.com: changed the title of the commit msg] Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen --- drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb.h | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb.h b/drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb.h index 4d1cff97be1..aa1b1d97427 100644 --- a/drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb.h +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/omapfb/omapfb.h @@ -34,8 +34,10 @@ #ifdef DEBUG extern unsigned int omapfb_debug; #define DBG(format, ...) \ - if (omapfb_debug) \ - printk(KERN_DEBUG "OMAPFB: " format, ## __VA_ARGS__) + do { \ + if (omapfb_debug) \ + printk(KERN_DEBUG "OMAPFB: " format, ## __VA_ARGS__); \ + } while (0) #else #define DBG(format, ...) #endif -- 2.39.2