From 4711e2f9caedaa07e7cdcb5e058a18762d6be9b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Gortmaker Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 20:05:49 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] x86: don't use module_init in non-modular intel_mid_vrtc.c The X86_INTEL_MID option is bool, and hence this code is either present or absent. It will never be modular, so using module_init as an alias for __initcall is rather misleading. Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that would be a worse thing. Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall directly in this change means that the runtime impact is zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering. Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: x86@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker --- arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_vrtc.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_vrtc.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_vrtc.c index 32947ba0f62d..ee40fcb6e54d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_vrtc.c +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_vrtc.c @@ -173,5 +173,4 @@ static int __init intel_mid_device_create(void) return platform_device_register(&vrtc_device); } - -module_init(intel_mid_device_create); +device_initcall(intel_mid_device_create); -- 2.39.5