From 48ac3271e52d23ee987da93f80d20f6bec8e6717 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:44:07 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] [CPUFREQ] cpufreq_ondemand.c: don't use _WORK_NAR Looks like dbs_timer() is very careful wrt per_cpu(cpu_dbs_info), and it doesn't need the help of WORK_STRUCT_NOAUTOREL. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-By: David Howells Signed-off-by: Dave Jones --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c index d60bcb9d14cc..8d053f500fc2 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c @@ -432,9 +432,6 @@ static void do_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work) /* We want all CPUs to do sampling nearly on same jiffy */ int delay = usecs_to_jiffies(dbs_tuners_ins.sampling_rate); - /* Permit rescheduling of this work item */ - work_release(work); - delay -= jiffies % delay; if (lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu) < 0) @@ -473,7 +470,7 @@ static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info) dbs_info->enable = 1; ondemand_powersave_bias_init(); dbs_info->sample_type = DBS_NORMAL_SAMPLE; - INIT_DELAYED_WORK_NAR(&dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer); + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer); queue_delayed_work_on(dbs_info->cpu, kondemand_wq, &dbs_info->work, delay); } -- 2.39.5