From 541d2d2fb60c88244a31b7d6f0460fc2d6d1c341 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 13:29:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ext3: Fix oops in ext3_try_to_allocate_with_rsv() commit ad95c5e9bc8b5885f94dce720137cac8fa8da4c9 upstream. Block allocation is called from two places: ext3_get_blocks_handle() and ext3_xattr_block_set(). These two callers are not necessarily synchronized because xattr code holds only xattr_sem and i_mutex, and ext3_get_blocks_handle() may hold only truncate_mutex when called from writepage() path. Block reservation code does not expect two concurrent allocations to happen to the same inode and thus assertions can be triggered or reservation structure corruption can occur. Fix the problem by taking truncate_mutex in xattr code to serialize allocations. CC: Sage Weil Reported-by: Fyodor Ustinov Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/ext3/xattr.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext3/xattr.c b/fs/ext3/xattr.c index 66895ccf76c7..bea12096b30e 100644 --- a/fs/ext3/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ext3/xattr.c @@ -803,8 +803,16 @@ inserted: /* We need to allocate a new block */ ext3_fsblk_t goal = ext3_group_first_block_no(sb, EXT3_I(inode)->i_block_group); - ext3_fsblk_t block = ext3_new_block(handle, inode, - goal, &error); + ext3_fsblk_t block; + + /* + * Protect us agaist concurrent allocations to the + * same inode from ext3_..._writepage(). Reservation + * code does not expect racing allocations. + */ + mutex_lock(&EXT3_I(inode)->truncate_mutex); + block = ext3_new_block(handle, inode, goal, &error); + mutex_unlock(&EXT3_I(inode)->truncate_mutex); if (error) goto cleanup; ea_idebug(inode, "creating block %d", block); -- 2.39.5