From 5795b170bfde23d424fb15d2c945d5dfb827e063 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gustavo Padovan Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:25:54 -0200 Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Add missing lock nesting notation commit dc2a0e20fbc85a71c63aa4330b496fda33f6bf80 upstream. This patch fixes the following report, it happens when accepting rfcomm connections: [ 228.165378] ============================================= [ 228.165378] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 228.165378] 3.7.0-rc1-00536-gc1d5dc4 #120 Tainted: G W [ 228.165378] --------------------------------------------- [ 228.165378] bluetoothd/1341 is trying to acquire lock: [ 228.165378] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at: [] bt_accept_dequeue+0xa0/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] but task is already holding lock: [ 228.165378] (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM){+.+...}, at: [] rfcomm_sock_accept+0x58/0x2d0 [rfcomm] [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] other info that might help us debug this: [ 228.165378] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] CPU0 [ 228.165378] ---- [ 228.165378] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM); [ 228.165378] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_RFCOMM); [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 228.165378] [ 228.165378] May be due to missing lock nesting notation Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c index b3226f3658cf..868a909272bc 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int f long timeo; int err = 0; - lock_sock(sk); + lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); if (sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM) { err = -EINVAL; @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int rfcomm_sock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int f release_sock(sk); timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo); - lock_sock(sk); + lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); } __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); remove_wait_queue(sk_sleep(sk), &wait); -- 2.39.5