From 58d73afffaaca54f581b8083689a7aaf5df1a920 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:15:57 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] [media] tm6000: remove a check for NO_PCM_LOCK This was likely used by some test. There's no sense on keeping it upstream. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-alsa.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-alsa.c b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-alsa.c index 2b96047c2983..a588f299af49 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-alsa.c +++ b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-alsa.c @@ -254,9 +254,7 @@ static int tm6000_fillbuf(struct tm6000_core *core, char *buf, int size) memcpy(runtime->dma_area + buf_pos * stride, buf, length * stride); -#ifndef NO_PCM_LOCK snd_pcm_stream_lock(substream); -#endif chip->buf_pos += length; if (chip->buf_pos >= runtime->buffer_size) @@ -268,9 +266,7 @@ static int tm6000_fillbuf(struct tm6000_core *core, char *buf, int size) period_elapsed = 1; } -#ifndef NO_PCM_LOCK snd_pcm_stream_unlock(substream); -#endif if (period_elapsed) snd_pcm_period_elapsed(substream); -- 2.39.5