From 5afab6bbf3f026b7d50451acbfdc12300c5f4353 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Smart Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:12:01 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] lpfc: Make write check error processing more resilient Make write check error processing more resilient. Checks to catch writes that fw reports weren't fully complete yet SCSI status indicated fine needed correction. Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy Signed-off-by: James Smart Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinicke Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c index ab446f83fba6..964a996dea2c 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c @@ -3676,6 +3676,7 @@ static void lpfc_handle_fcp_err(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_scsi_buf *lpfc_cmd, struct lpfc_iocbq *rsp_iocb) { + struct lpfc_hba *phba = vport->phba; struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd = lpfc_cmd->pCmd; struct fcp_cmnd *fcpcmd = lpfc_cmd->fcp_cmnd; struct fcp_rsp *fcprsp = lpfc_cmd->fcp_rsp; @@ -3685,6 +3686,7 @@ lpfc_handle_fcp_err(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_scsi_buf *lpfc_cmd, uint32_t *lp; uint32_t host_status = DID_OK; uint32_t rsplen = 0; + uint32_t fcpDl; uint32_t logit = LOG_FCP | LOG_FCP_ERROR; @@ -3755,13 +3757,14 @@ lpfc_handle_fcp_err(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_scsi_buf *lpfc_cmd, fcprsp->rspInfo3); scsi_set_resid(cmnd, 0); + fcpDl = be32_to_cpu(fcpcmd->fcpDl); if (resp_info & RESID_UNDER) { scsi_set_resid(cmnd, be32_to_cpu(fcprsp->rspResId)); lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_INFO, LOG_FCP_UNDER, "9025 FCP Read Underrun, expected %d, " "residual %d Data: x%x x%x x%x\n", - be32_to_cpu(fcpcmd->fcpDl), + fcpDl, scsi_get_resid(cmnd), fcpi_parm, cmnd->cmnd[0], cmnd->underflow); @@ -3777,7 +3780,7 @@ lpfc_handle_fcp_err(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_scsi_buf *lpfc_cmd, LOG_FCP | LOG_FCP_ERROR, "9026 FCP Read Check Error " "and Underrun Data: x%x x%x x%x x%x\n", - be32_to_cpu(fcpcmd->fcpDl), + fcpDl, scsi_get_resid(cmnd), fcpi_parm, cmnd->cmnd[0]); scsi_set_resid(cmnd, scsi_bufflen(cmnd)); @@ -3812,13 +3815,25 @@ lpfc_handle_fcp_err(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_scsi_buf *lpfc_cmd, * Check SLI validation that all the transfer was actually done * (fcpi_parm should be zero). Apply check only to reads. */ - } else if (fcpi_parm && (cmnd->sc_data_direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE)) { + } else if (fcpi_parm) { lpfc_printf_vlog(vport, KERN_WARNING, LOG_FCP | LOG_FCP_ERROR, - "9029 FCP Read Check Error Data: " + "9029 FCP %s Check Error xri x%x Data: " "x%x x%x x%x x%x x%x\n", - be32_to_cpu(fcpcmd->fcpDl), - be32_to_cpu(fcprsp->rspResId), + ((cmnd->sc_data_direction == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) ? + "Read" : "Write"), + ((phba->sli_rev == LPFC_SLI_REV4) ? + lpfc_cmd->cur_iocbq.sli4_xritag : + rsp_iocb->iocb.ulpContext), + fcpDl, be32_to_cpu(fcprsp->rspResId), fcpi_parm, cmnd->cmnd[0], scsi_status); + + /* There is some issue with the LPe12000 that causes it + * to miscalculate the fcpi_parm and falsely trip this + * recovery logic. Detect this case and don't error when true. + */ + if (fcpi_parm > fcpDl) + goto out; + switch (scsi_status) { case SAM_STAT_GOOD: case SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION: -- 2.39.5