From 66be6056eba80690bb7fa3d983c21494e1950bea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfram Sang Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:43:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] i2c: rename address check functions The current naming is based on the arguments of the functions and not on what they do. Even I as the maintainer find this confusing, so let's rename them to something more descriptive. Tested-by: Andrey Danin Acked-by: Stephen Warren Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang --- drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c index 47dbe2514741..fced494040a8 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static unsigned short i2c_encode_flags_to_addr(struct i2c_client *client) /* This is a permissive address validity check, I2C address map constraints * are purposely not enforced, except for the general call address. */ -static int i2c_check_client_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client) +static int i2c_check_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client) { if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN) { /* 10-bit address, all values are valid */ @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static int i2c_check_client_addr_validity(const struct i2c_client *client) * device uses a reserved address, then it shouldn't be probed. 7-bit * addressing is assumed, 10-bit address devices are rare and should be * explicitly enumerated. */ -static int i2c_check_addr_validity(unsigned short addr) +static int i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(unsigned short addr) { /* * Reserved addresses per I2C specification: @@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_board_info const *info) strlcpy(client->name, info->type, sizeof(client->name)); /* Check for address validity */ - status = i2c_check_client_addr_validity(client); + status = i2c_check_addr_validity(client); if (status) { dev_err(&adap->dev, "Invalid %d-bit I2C address 0x%02hx\n", client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN ? 10 : 7, client->addr); @@ -2296,7 +2296,7 @@ static int i2c_detect_address(struct i2c_client *temp_client, int err; /* Make sure the address is valid */ - err = i2c_check_addr_validity(addr); + err = i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr); if (err) { dev_warn(&adapter->dev, "Invalid probe address 0x%02x\n", addr); @@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ i2c_new_probed_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, for (i = 0; addr_list[i] != I2C_CLIENT_END; i++) { /* Check address validity */ - if (i2c_check_addr_validity(addr_list[i]) < 0) { + if (i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(addr_list[i]) < 0) { dev_warn(&adap->dev, "Invalid 7-bit address " "0x%02x\n", addr_list[i]); continue; @@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ int i2c_slave_register(struct i2c_client *client, i2c_slave_cb_t slave_cb) if (!(client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_TEN)) { /* Enforce stricter address checking */ - ret = i2c_check_addr_validity(client->addr); + ret = i2c_check_7bit_addr_validity_strict(client->addr); if (ret) { dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: invalid address\n", __func__); return ret; -- 2.39.5