From 67e5871be82fec1451801d448b51d9a403d1ffac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:35:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Drop forcewake w/a for missed interrupts/seqno on Sandybridge I believe, and an evening of i-g-t, that our original workaround for the missed interrupts on Sandybridge, that of holding forcewake whilst we wait for an interrupts, is no longer required. This leaves us dependent on the second workaround of forcing an UC read of the ACTHD before reading back the seqno from the snooped HWS. Dropping the forcewake should allow us to conserve a little power, not much as the GPU is meant to be busy whilst we wait for it! Cc: Jesse Barnes Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 7 ------- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index b65f4d77e3ed..69589e4f957f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -1032,11 +1032,6 @@ gen6_ring_get_irq(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) if (!dev->irq_enabled) return false; - /* It looks like we need to prevent the gt from suspending while waiting - * for an notifiy irq, otherwise irqs seem to get lost on at least the - * blt/bsd rings on ivb. */ - gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv); - spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, flags); if (ring->irq_refcount++ == 0) { if (HAS_L3_DPF(dev) && ring->id == RCS) @@ -1068,8 +1063,6 @@ gen6_ring_put_irq(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring) ilk_disable_gt_irq(dev_priv, ring->irq_enable_mask); } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, flags); - - gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv); } static bool -- 2.39.5