From 697f0a487f294e634a342764472b79375bb3158a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gregory Haskins Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:08:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] sched: clean up this_rq use in kernel/sched_rt.c "this_rq" is normally used to denote the RQ on the current cpu (i.e. "cpu_rq(this_cpu)"). So clean up the usage of this_rq to be more consistent with the rest of the code. Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched_rt.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c index ae4995c09aac..b788e35ffd3f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c @@ -328,21 +328,21 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, * running task can migrate over to a CPU that is running a task * of lesser priority. */ -static int push_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) +static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq) { struct task_struct *next_task; struct rq *lowest_rq; int ret = 0; int paranoid = RT_MAX_TRIES; - assert_spin_locked(&this_rq->lock); + assert_spin_locked(&rq->lock); - next_task = pick_next_highest_task_rt(this_rq, -1); + next_task = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, -1); if (!next_task) return 0; retry: - if (unlikely(next_task == this_rq->curr)) { + if (unlikely(next_task == rq->curr)) { WARN_ON(1); return 0; } @@ -352,24 +352,24 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) * higher priority than current. If that's the case * just reschedule current. */ - if (unlikely(next_task->prio < this_rq->curr->prio)) { - resched_task(this_rq->curr); + if (unlikely(next_task->prio < rq->curr->prio)) { + resched_task(rq->curr); return 0; } - /* We might release this_rq lock */ + /* We might release rq lock */ get_task_struct(next_task); /* find_lock_lowest_rq locks the rq if found */ - lowest_rq = find_lock_lowest_rq(next_task, this_rq); + lowest_rq = find_lock_lowest_rq(next_task, rq); if (!lowest_rq) { struct task_struct *task; /* - * find lock_lowest_rq releases this_rq->lock + * find lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock * so it is possible that next_task has changed. * If it has, then try again. */ - task = pick_next_highest_task_rt(this_rq, -1); + task = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, -1); if (unlikely(task != next_task) && task && paranoid--) { put_task_struct(next_task); next_task = task; @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq) assert_spin_locked(&lowest_rq->lock); - deactivate_task(this_rq, next_task, 0); + deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0); set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu); activate_task(lowest_rq, next_task, 0); -- 2.39.5