From 725634828e0655bfd564171880c6479c72d7993b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hugh Dickins Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:03:41 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] tmpfs: change final i_blocks BUG to WARNING Under a particular load on one machine, I have hit shmem_evict_inode()'s BUG_ON(inode->i_blocks), enough times to narrow it down to a particular race between swapout and eviction. It comes from the "if (freed > 0)" asymmetry in shmem_recalc_inode(), and the lack of coherent locking between mapping's nrpages and shmem's swapped count. There's a window in shmem_writepage(), between lowering nrpages in shmem_delete_from_page_cache() and then raising swapped count, when the freed count appears to be +1 when it should be 0, and then the asymmetry stops it from being corrected with -1 before hitting the BUG. One answer is coherent locking: using tree_lock throughout, without info->lock; reasonable, but the raw_spin_lock in percpu_counter_add() on used_blocks makes that messier than expected. Another answer may be a further effort to eliminate the weird shmem_recalc_inode() altogether, but previous attempts at that failed. So far undecided, but for now change the BUG_ON to WARN_ON: in usual circumstances it remains a useful consistency check. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/shmem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index 0c6c0fd51997..7dccdb8ea1dd 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ static void shmem_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) kfree(info->symlink); simple_xattrs_free(&info->xattrs); - BUG_ON(inode->i_blocks); + WARN_ON(inode->i_blocks); shmem_free_inode(inode->i_sb); clear_inode(inode); } -- 2.39.5