From 7400d3bbaa229eb8e7631d28fb34afd7cd2c96ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Byungchul Park Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:07:49 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Avoid using decay_load_missed() with a negative value decay_load_missed() cannot handle nagative values, so we need to prevent using the function with a negative value. Reported-by: Dietmar Eggemann Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Chris Metcalf Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Luiz Capitulino Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Paul E . McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: perterz@infradead.org Fixes: 59543275488d ("sched/fair: Prepare __update_cpu_load() to handle active tickless") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160115070749.GA1914@X58A-UD3R Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 564104227498..3b3dc39671f8 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -4509,9 +4509,17 @@ static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned long this_load, /* scale is effectively 1 << i now, and >> i divides by scale */ - old_load = this_rq->cpu_load[i] - tickless_load; + old_load = this_rq->cpu_load[i]; old_load = decay_load_missed(old_load, pending_updates - 1, i); - old_load += tickless_load; + if (tickless_load) { + old_load -= decay_load_missed(tickless_load, pending_updates - 1, i); + /* + * old_load can never be a negative value because a + * decayed tickless_load cannot be greater than the + * original tickless_load. + */ + old_load += tickless_load; + } new_load = this_load; /* * Round up the averaging division if load is increasing. This -- 2.39.5