From 75a0ef0b7765f5c98be64f6fbcdceb0693b84210 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yinghai Lu Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:52:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x86, numa: For each node, register the memory blocks actually used commit 73cf624d029d776a33d0a80c695485b3f9b36231 upstream. Russ reported SGI UV is broken recently. He said: | The SRAT table shows that memory range is spread over two nodes. | | SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 100000000-800000000 | SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 800000000-1000000000 | SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 1000000000-1080000000 | |Previously, the kernel early_node_map[] would show three entries |with the proper node. | |[ 0.000000] 0: 0x00100000 -> 0x00800000 |[ 0.000000] 1: 0x00800000 -> 0x01000000 |[ 0.000000] 0: 0x01000000 -> 0x01080000 | |The problem is recent community kernel early_node_map[] shows |only two entries with the node 0 entry overlapping the node 1 |entry. | | 0: 0x00100000 -> 0x01080000 | 1: 0x00800000 -> 0x01000000 After looking at the changelog, Found out that it has been broken for a while by following commit |commit 8716273caef7f55f39fe4fc6c69c5f9f197f41f1 |Author: David Rientjes |Date: Fri Sep 25 15:20:04 2009 -0700 | | x86: Export srat physical topology Before that commit, register_active_regions() is called for every SRAT memory entry right away. Use nodememblk_range[] instead of nodes[] in order to make sure we capture the actual memory blocks registered with each node. nodes[] contains an extended range which spans all memory regions associated with a node, but that does not mean that all the memory in between are included. Reported-by: Russ Anderson Tested-by: Russ Anderson Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu LKML-Reference: <4CB27BDF.5000800@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Rientjes Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c index f9897f7a9ef1..9c0d0d399c30 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c @@ -420,9 +420,11 @@ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end) return -1; } - for_each_node_mask(i, nodes_parsed) - e820_register_active_regions(i, nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT, - nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT); + for (i = 0; i < num_node_memblks; i++) + e820_register_active_regions(memblk_nodeid[i], + node_memblk_range[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT, + node_memblk_range[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT); + /* for out of order entries in SRAT */ sort_node_map(); if (!nodes_cover_memory(nodes)) { -- 2.39.5