From 7800fb69ddf3a13d2055009c87eacf7f46f907c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Vetter Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:24:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Update comment that sets I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The code was moved, but the comment not updated. It confused me. Fixes: 7f4c62840cc4 ("drm/i915: Assign hwmode after encoder state readout") Cc: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: Patrik Jakobsson Cc: Ville Syrjälä Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161219082423.27798-6-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 +++----------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 287b35a39e18..7c670d3ba465 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -16962,17 +16962,9 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev) * the atomic core happy. It wants a valid mode if the * crtc's enabled, so we do the above call. * - * At this point some state updated by the connectors - * in their ->detect() callback has not run yet, so - * no recalculation can be done yet. - * - * Even if we could do a recalculation and modeset - * right now it would cause a double modeset if - * fbdev or userspace chooses a different initial mode. - * - * If that happens, someone indicated they wanted a - * mode change, which means it's safe to do a full - * recalculation. + * But we don't set all the derived state fully, hence + * set a flag to indicate that a full recalculation is + * needed on the next commit. */ crtc->base.state->mode.private_flags = I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED; -- 2.39.5