From 7ba554b5ac69e5f3edac9ce3233beb5acd480878 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Beulich Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:16:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/32: Really make user_mode() work correctly for VM86 mode While commit efa7045103 ("x86/asm/entry: Make user_mode() work correctly if regs came from VM86 mode") claims that "user_mode() is now identical to user_mode_vm()", this wasn't actually the case - no prior commit made it so. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5566EB0D020000780007E655@mail.emea.novell.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h index 19507ffa5d28..5fabf1362942 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline unsigned long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs) static inline int user_mode(struct pt_regs *regs) { #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 - return (regs->cs & SEGMENT_RPL_MASK) == USER_RPL; + return ((regs->cs & SEGMENT_RPL_MASK) | (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)) >= USER_RPL; #else return !!(regs->cs & 3); #endif -- 2.39.5