From 7c614d6461399acca5c0ba444f5db49cb332fc08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:42:00 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Add "notrace" to RCU function headers used by ftrace Both rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace() and rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace() are used by ftrace, and thus need to be marked "notrace". Unfortunately, my naive assumption that gcc would see the inner "notrace" does not hold. Kudos to Lai Jiangshan for noting this. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar Bug-spotted-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Cc: josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com Cc: niv@us.ibm.com Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org LKML-Reference: <12511321213243-git-send-email-> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- include/linux/rcupdate.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h index ec90fc34fea..8b4422c558d 100644 --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched(void) __acquire(RCU_SCHED); rcu_read_acquire(); } -static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void) +static inline notrace void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void) { preempt_disable_notrace(); __acquire(RCU_SCHED); @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched(void) __release(RCU_SCHED); preempt_enable(); } -static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void) +static inline notrace void rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(void) { rcu_read_release(); __release(RCU_SCHED); -- 2.39.5