From 7c9fd60f9764373414c0a64f500a78635b0a0a7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:06:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ath9k: Fix bug in the way "bf_tx_aborted" of struct ath_buf is used This bug was introduced by the following commit Author: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan Date: Thu Apr 15 17:38:46 2010 -0400 ath9k: Remove ATH9K_TX_SW_ABORTED and introduce a bool for this purpose Wrong buffer is checked for bf_tx_aborted field in ath_tx_num_badfrms(), this may result in a rate scaling with wrong feedback (number of unacked frames in this case). It is the last one in the chain of buffers for an aggregate frame that should be checked. Also it misses the initialization of this field in the buffer, this may lead to a situation where we stop the sw retransmission of failed subframes associated to this buffer. Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan Signed-off-by: John W. Linville --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c index 09cb13c4854c..859aa4ab0769 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/xmit.c @@ -1728,6 +1728,8 @@ static int ath_tx_setup_buffer(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ath_buf *bf, } else bf->bf_isnullfunc = false; + bf->bf_tx_aborted = false; + return 0; } @@ -1989,7 +1991,7 @@ static int ath_tx_num_badfrms(struct ath_softc *sc, struct ath_buf *bf, int nbad = 0; int isaggr = 0; - if (bf->bf_tx_aborted) + if (bf->bf_lastbf->bf_tx_aborted) return 0; isaggr = bf_isaggr(bf); -- 2.39.5