From 80fe4269ca09149e523f68fb65872fee9989c3d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shawn Bohrer Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:21:32 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] futex: Fix regression with read only mappings commit 9ea71503a8ed9184d2d0b8ccc4d269d05f7940ae upstream. commit 7485d0d3758e8e6491a5c9468114e74dc050785d (futexes: Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()) in 2.6.33 fixed two problems: First, It prevented a loop when encountering a ZERO_PAGE. Second, it fixed RW MAP_PRIVATE futex operations by forcing the COW to occur by unconditionally performing a write access get_user_pages_fast() to get the page. The commit also introduced a user-mode regression in that it broke futex operations on read-only memory maps. For example, this breaks workloads that have one or more reader processes doing a FUTEX_WAIT on a futex within a read only shared file mapping, and a writer processes that has a writable mapping issuing the FUTEX_WAKE. This fixes the regression for valid futex operations on RO mappings by trying a RO get_user_pages_fast() when the RW get_user_pages_fast() fails. This change makes it necessary to also check for invalid use cases, such as anonymous RO mappings (which can never change) and the ZERO_PAGE which the commit referenced above was written to address. This patch does restore the original behavior with RO MAP_PRIVATE mappings, which have inherent user-mode usage problems and don't really make sense. With this patch performing a FUTEX_WAIT within a RO MAP_PRIVATE mapping will be successfully woken provided another process updates the region of the underlying mapped file. However, the mmap() man page states that for a MAP_PRIVATE mapping: It is unspecified whether changes made to the file after the mmap() call are visible in the mapped region. So user-mode users attempting to use futex operations on RO MAP_PRIVATE mappings are depending on unspecified behavior. Additionally a RO MAP_PRIVATE mapping could fail to wake up in the following case. Thread-A: call futex(FUTEX_WAIT, memory-region-A). get_futex_key() return inode based key. sleep on the key Thread-B: call mprotect(PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, memory-region-A) Thread-B: write memory-region-A. COW happen. This process's memory-region-A become related to new COWed private (ie PageAnon=1) page. Thread-B: call futex(FUETX_WAKE, memory-region-A). get_futex_key() return mm based key. IOW, we fail to wake up Thread-A. Once again doing something like this is just silly and users who do something like this get what they deserve. While RO MAP_PRIVATE mappings are nonsensical, checking for a private mapping requires walking the vmas and was deemed too costly to avoid a userspace hang. This Patch is based on Peter Zijlstra's initial patch with modifications to only allow RO mappings for futex operations that need VERIFY_READ access. Reported-by: David Oliver Signed-off-by: Shawn Bohrer Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Darren Hart Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Cc: zvonler@rgmadvisors.com Cc: hughd@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1309450892-30676-1-git-send-email-sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [PG: in 34, the variable is "page"; in original 9ea71503a it is page_head] Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker --- kernel/futex.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index e328f574c97c..98a354dfbe84 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ static void drop_futex_key_refs(union futex_key *key) * @uaddr: virtual address of the futex * @fshared: 0 for a PROCESS_PRIVATE futex, 1 for PROCESS_SHARED * @key: address where result is stored. + * @rw: mapping needs to be read/write (values: VERIFY_READ, + * VERIFY_WRITE) * * Returns a negative error code or 0 * The key words are stored in *key on success. @@ -214,12 +216,12 @@ static void drop_futex_key_refs(union futex_key *key) * lock_page() might sleep, the caller should not hold a spinlock. */ static int -get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key) +get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key, int rw) { unsigned long address = (unsigned long)uaddr; struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm; struct page *page; - int err; + int err, ro = 0; /* * The futex address must be "naturally" aligned. @@ -247,14 +249,31 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key) again: err = get_user_pages_fast(address, 1, 1, &page); + /* + * If write access is not required (eg. FUTEX_WAIT), try + * and get read-only access. + */ + if (err == -EFAULT && rw == VERIFY_READ) { + err = get_user_pages_fast(address, 1, 0, &page); + ro = 1; + } if (err < 0) return err; + else + err = 0; page = compound_head(page); lock_page(page); if (!page->mapping) { unlock_page(page); put_page(page); + /* + * ZERO_PAGE pages don't have a mapping. Avoid a busy loop + * trying to find one. RW mapping would have COW'd (and thus + * have a mapping) so this page is RO and won't ever change. + */ + if ((page == ZERO_PAGE(address))) + return -EFAULT; goto again; } @@ -266,6 +285,15 @@ again: * the object not the particular process. */ if (PageAnon(page)) { + /* + * A RO anonymous page will never change and thus doesn't make + * sense for futex operations. + */ + if (ro) { + err = -EFAULT; + goto out; + } + key->both.offset |= FUT_OFF_MMSHARED; /* ref taken on mm */ key->private.mm = mm; key->private.address = address; @@ -277,9 +305,10 @@ again: get_futex_key_refs(key); +out: unlock_page(page); put_page(page); - return 0; + return err; } static inline @@ -880,7 +909,7 @@ static int futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, int nr_wake, u32 bitset) if (!bitset) return -EINVAL; - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, fshared, &key); + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, fshared, &key, VERIFY_READ); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto out; @@ -926,10 +955,10 @@ futex_wake_op(u32 __user *uaddr1, int fshared, u32 __user *uaddr2, int ret, op_ret; retry: - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr1, fshared, &key1); + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr1, fshared, &key1, VERIFY_READ); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto out; - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2); + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2, VERIFY_WRITE); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto out_put_key1; @@ -1188,10 +1217,11 @@ retry: pi_state = NULL; } - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr1, fshared, &key1); + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr1, fshared, &key1, VERIFY_READ); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto out; - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2); + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2, + requeue_pi ? VERIFY_WRITE : VERIFY_READ); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto out_put_key1; @@ -1746,7 +1776,7 @@ static int futex_wait_setup(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, int fshared, */ retry: q->key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, fshared, &q->key); + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, fshared, &q->key, VERIFY_READ); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) return ret; @@ -1912,7 +1942,7 @@ static int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, q.requeue_pi_key = NULL; retry: q.key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, fshared, &q.key); + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, fshared, &q.key, VERIFY_WRITE); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto out; @@ -2031,7 +2061,7 @@ retry: if ((uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) != task_pid_vnr(current)) return -EPERM; - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, fshared, &key); + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr, fshared, &key, VERIFY_WRITE); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto out; @@ -2223,7 +2253,7 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, rt_waiter.task = NULL; key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; - ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2); + ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, fshared, &key2, VERIFY_WRITE); if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto out; -- 2.39.5