From 8f8e05c5708d7e9017c47f395f8b1498f7f52922 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "J.Bruce Fields" Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 02:16:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] knfsd: svcrpc: use consistent variable name for the reply state The rpc reply has multiple levels of error returns. The code here contributes to the confusion by using "accept_statp" for a pointer to what the rfc (and wireshark, etc.) refer to as the "reply_stat". (The confusion is compounded by the fact that the rfc also has an "accept_stat" which follows the reply_stat in the succesful case.) Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Neil Brown Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- net/sunrpc/svc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c index 550441d13a08..c2c8bb20d07f 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) u32 dir, prog, vers, proc; __be32 auth_stat, rpc_stat; int auth_res; - __be32 *accept_statp; + __be32 *reply_statp; rpc_stat = rpc_success; @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ svc_process(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) goto err_bad_rpc; /* Save position in case we later decide to reject: */ - accept_statp = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len; + reply_statp = resv->iov_base + resv->iov_len; svc_putnl(resv, 0); /* ACCEPT */ @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ err_bad_auth: dprintk("svc: authentication failed (%d)\n", ntohl(auth_stat)); serv->sv_stats->rpcbadauth++; /* Restore write pointer to location of accept status: */ - xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, accept_statp); + xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, reply_statp); svc_putnl(resv, 1); /* REJECT */ svc_putnl(resv, 1); /* AUTH_ERROR */ svc_putnl(resv, ntohl(auth_stat)); /* status */ -- 2.39.5