From 924e101a7ab6f884047f4344e5f1154a4bcd63a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:37:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86/debug: Dump family, model, stepping of the boot CPU When acting on a user bug report, we find ourselves constantly asking for /proc/cpuinfo in order to know the exact family, model, stepping of the CPU in question. Instead of having to ask this, add this to dmesg so that it is visible and no ambiguities can ensue from looking at the official name string of the CPU coming from CPUID and trying to map it to f/m/s. Output then looks like this: [ 0.146041] smpboot: CPU0: AMD FX(tm)-8100 Eight-Core Processor (fam: 15, model: 01, stepping: 02) Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Andreas Herrmann Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1347640666-13638-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org [ tweaked it minimally to add commas. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index a5fbc3c5fccc..1cc48ff91cb3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1023,14 +1023,16 @@ void __cpuinit print_cpu_info(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) printk(KERN_CONT "%s ", vendor); if (c->x86_model_id[0]) - printk(KERN_CONT "%s", c->x86_model_id); + printk(KERN_CONT "%s", strim(c->x86_model_id)); else printk(KERN_CONT "%d86", c->x86); + printk(KERN_CONT " (fam: %02x, model: %02x", c->x86, c->x86_model); + if (c->x86_mask || c->cpuid_level >= 0) - printk(KERN_CONT " stepping %02x\n", c->x86_mask); + printk(KERN_CONT ", stepping: %02x)\n", c->x86_mask); else - printk(KERN_CONT "\n"); + printk(KERN_CONT ")\n"); print_cpu_msr(c); } -- 2.39.5