From 94405713889d4a9d341b4ad92956e4e2ec8ec2c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:41:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: replace bogus assertion in ext4_xattr_shift_entries() We were checking whether computed offsets do not exceed end of block in ext4_xattr_shift_entries(). However this does not make sense since we always only decrease offsets. So replace that assertion with a check whether we really decrease xattrs value offsets. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o --- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c index 1447860b61ec..82b025c977fc 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c @@ -1319,18 +1319,19 @@ retry: */ static void ext4_xattr_shift_entries(struct ext4_xattr_entry *entry, int value_offs_shift, void *to, - void *from, size_t n, int blocksize) + void *from, size_t n) { struct ext4_xattr_entry *last = entry; int new_offs; + /* We always shift xattr headers further thus offsets get lower */ + BUG_ON(value_offs_shift > 0); + /* Adjust the value offsets of the entries */ for (; !IS_LAST_ENTRY(last); last = EXT4_XATTR_NEXT(last)) { if (last->e_value_size) { new_offs = le16_to_cpu(last->e_value_offs) + value_offs_shift; - BUG_ON(new_offs + le32_to_cpu(last->e_value_size) - > blocksize); last->e_value_offs = cpu_to_le16(new_offs); } } @@ -1542,7 +1543,7 @@ shift: ext4_xattr_shift_entries(entry, EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize - new_extra_isize, (void *)raw_inode + EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + new_extra_isize, - (void *)header, total_ino, inode->i_sb->s_blocksize); + (void *)header, total_ino); EXT4_I(inode)->i_extra_isize = new_extra_isize; brelse(bh); out: -- 2.39.5