From 97f475f0eba0154217b48d0bd5edeeda0c2733f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:11:54 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] mm-vmscan-distinguish-between-memcg-triggering-reclaim-and-memcg-being-scanned-checkpatch-fixes Cc: Balbir Singh WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (16, 20) #421: FILE: mm/vmscan.c:1843: + if (inactive_list_is_low(mz, file)) + shrink_active_list(nr_to_scan, mz, sc, priority, file); total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 599 lines checked ./patches/mm-vmscan-distinguish-between-memcg-triggering-reclaim-and-memcg-being-scanned.patch has style problems, please review. If any of these errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Johannes Weiner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/vmscan.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 494ae237ce98..06ee7604c10f 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -1841,7 +1841,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan, if (is_active_lru(lru)) { if (inactive_list_is_low(mz, file)) - shrink_active_list(nr_to_scan, mz, sc, priority, file); + shrink_active_list(nr_to_scan, mz, sc, priority, file); return 0; } -- 2.39.5