From 9cfd5a23a49c2a2cb9ff5537128d03547cbd2990 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jukka Rissanen Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:16:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Wrong style spin lock used Use spin_lock_bh() as the code is called from softirq in networking subsystem. This is needed to prevent deadlocks when 6lowpan link is in use. Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann --- net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c index ddf33900f7f3..91995f8ab0a0 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c @@ -4661,8 +4661,12 @@ static void hci_queue_acl(struct hci_chan *chan, struct sk_buff_head *queue, skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = NULL; - /* Queue all fragments atomically */ - spin_lock(&queue->lock); + /* Queue all fragments atomically. We need to use spin_lock_bh + * here because of 6LoWPAN links, as there this function is + * called from softirq and using normal spin lock could cause + * deadlocks. + */ + spin_lock_bh(&queue->lock); __skb_queue_tail(queue, skb); @@ -4679,7 +4683,7 @@ static void hci_queue_acl(struct hci_chan *chan, struct sk_buff_head *queue, __skb_queue_tail(queue, skb); } while (list); - spin_unlock(&queue->lock); + spin_unlock_bh(&queue->lock); } } -- 2.39.5