From 9f646389aa7727a2fd8f9ae6337b92af9cfbc264 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 16:39:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sched/x86: Use cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu) for coregroup_mask Commit commit 8e7fbcbc2 ("sched: Remove stale power aware scheduling remnants and dysfunctional knobs") made a boo-boo with removing the power aware scheduling muck from the x86 topology bits. We should unconditionally use the llc_shared mask for multi-core. Reported-and-tested-by: Mike Galbraith Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Andreas Herrmann Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-lsksc2kfyeveb13avh327p0d@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c index f56f96da77f5..fd019d78b1f4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c @@ -410,15 +410,7 @@ void __cpuinit set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu) /* maps the cpu to the sched domain representing multi-core */ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu) { - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); - /* - * For perf, we return last level cache shared map. - * And for power savings, we return cpu_core_map - */ - if (!(cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_AMD_DCM))) - return cpu_core_mask(cpu); - else - return cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu); + return cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu); } static void impress_friends(void) -- 2.39.5