From a13fbe549fded5b77e020d4e08f1f74e212cc543 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Greear Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:19:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mac80211: be more careful about sending beacon-loss-events I don't think we should send the events unless it was actually a beacon that was lost...not just any probe of an AP. Signed-off-by: Ben Greear Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg --- net/mac80211/mlme.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mac80211/mlme.c b/net/mac80211/mlme.c index 237e2ef42ba9..e12fedcfa988 100644 --- a/net/mac80211/mlme.c +++ b/net/mac80211/mlme.c @@ -1988,13 +1988,15 @@ static void ieee80211_mgd_probe_ap(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata, goto out; } - if (beacon) + if (beacon) { mlme_dbg_ratelimited(sdata, "detected beacon loss from AP (missed %d beacons) - probing\n", beacon_loss_count); - ieee80211_cqm_rssi_notify(&sdata->vif, - NL80211_CQM_RSSI_BEACON_LOSS_EVENT, GFP_KERNEL); + ieee80211_cqm_rssi_notify(&sdata->vif, + NL80211_CQM_RSSI_BEACON_LOSS_EVENT, + GFP_KERNEL); + } /* * The driver/our work has already reported this event or the -- 2.39.5