From a52865c239b1bc4f62e387509b1ad3415e476ee5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:51:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] libata hpt3xn: Hopefully sort out the DPLL logic versus the vendor code Rather than ending up with two layers of negation jut rename the variable and lose one. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c index f6817b4093a4..886fab9aa62c 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ #include #define DRV_NAME "pata_hpt3x2n" -#define DRV_VERSION "0.3" +#define DRV_VERSION "0.3.2" enum { HPT_PCI_FAST = (1 << 31), @@ -297,11 +297,11 @@ static int hpt3x2n_pair_idle(struct ata_port *ap) return 0; } -static int hpt3x2n_use_dpll(struct ata_port *ap, int reading) +static int hpt3x2n_use_dpll(struct ata_port *ap, int writing) { long flags = (long)ap->host->private_data; /* See if we should use the DPLL */ - if (reading == 0) + if (writing) return USE_DPLL; /* Needed for write */ if (flags & PCI66) return USE_DPLL; /* Needed at 66Mhz */ -- 2.39.5