From acfaccd16f9a9e81b7f4dac87617188387220227 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:31:47 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Fix stacktrace of latency tracers (irqsoff and friends) commit db4c75cbebd7e5910cd3bcb6790272fcc3042857 upstream. While debugging a latency with someone on IRC (mirage335) on #linux-rt (OFTC), we discovered that the stacktrace output of the latency tracers (preemptirqsoff) was empty. This bug was caused by the creation of the dynamic length stack trace again (like commit 12b5da3 "tracing: Fix ent_size in trace output" was). This bug is caused by the latency tracers requiring the next event to determine the time between the current event and the next. But by grabbing the next event, the iter->ent_size is set to the next event instead of the current one. As the stacktrace event is the last event, this makes the ent_size zero and causes nothing to be printed for the stack trace. The dynamic stacktrace uses the ent_size to determine how much of the stack can be printed. The ent_size of zero means no stack. The simple fix is to save the iter->ent_size before finding the next event. Note, mirage335 asked to remain anonymous from LKML and git, so I will not add the Reported-by and Tested-by tags, even though he did report the issue and tested the fix. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c index 0d6ff3555942..d9c07f02de67 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c @@ -650,6 +650,8 @@ int trace_print_lat_context(struct trace_iterator *iter) { u64 next_ts; int ret; + /* trace_find_next_entry will reset ent_size */ + int ent_size = iter->ent_size; struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq; struct trace_entry *entry = iter->ent, *next_entry = trace_find_next_entry(iter, NULL, @@ -658,6 +660,9 @@ int trace_print_lat_context(struct trace_iterator *iter) unsigned long abs_usecs = ns2usecs(iter->ts - iter->tr->time_start); unsigned long rel_usecs; + /* Restore the original ent_size */ + iter->ent_size = ent_size; + if (!next_entry) next_ts = iter->ts; rel_usecs = ns2usecs(next_ts - iter->ts); -- 2.39.5