From b698c784bfacc909b05e043d8fca08281fe154bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans Verkuil Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:53:01 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] [media] V4L2 spec: fix the description of V4L2_FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY V4L2_FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY is the opposite of V4L2_FBUF_CAP_CHROMAKEY, but according to the documentation it was the same. The terms 'video' and 'framebuffer' were accidentally swapped in the text. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil CC: Vaibhav Hiremath Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-fbuf.xml | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-fbuf.xml b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-fbuf.xml index 109d7294d355..93817f337033 100644 --- a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-fbuf.xml +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-g-fbuf.xml @@ -340,8 +340,8 @@ blending makes no sense for destructive overlays. V4L2_FBUF_CAP_SRC_CHROMAKEY 0x0080 - The device supports Source Chroma-keying. Framebuffer pixels -with the chroma-key colors are replaced by video pixels, which is exactly opposite of + The device supports Source Chroma-keying. Video pixels +with the chroma-key colors are replaced by framebuffer pixels, which is exactly opposite of V4L2_FBUF_CAP_CHROMAKEY -- 2.39.5