From b80119bb35a49a4e8dbfb9708872adfd5cf38dee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:22:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] xen/x86-64: clean up warnings about IST-using traps Ignore known IST-using traps. Aside from the debugger traps, they're low-level faults which Xen will handle for us, so the kernel needn't worry about them. Keep warning in case unknown trap starts using IST. Impact: suppress spurious warnings Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge --- arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c index 7566e13c0cac..e9df942aa143 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c @@ -439,14 +439,32 @@ static int cvt_gate_to_trap(int vector, const gate_desc *val, addr = gate_offset(*val); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 + /* + * Look for known traps using IST, and substitute them + * appropriately. The debugger ones are the only ones we care + * about. Xen will handle faults like double_fault and + * machine_check, so we should never see them. Warn if + * there's an unexpected IST-using fault handler. + */ if (addr == (unsigned long)debug) addr = (unsigned long)xen_debug; else if (addr == (unsigned long)int3) addr = (unsigned long)xen_int3; else if (addr == (unsigned long)stack_segment) addr = (unsigned long)xen_stack_segment; - else - WARN_ON(val->ist != 0); + else if (addr == (unsigned long)double_fault || + addr == (unsigned long)nmi) { + /* Don't need to handle these */ + return 0; +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE + } else if (addr == (unsigned long)machine_check) { + return 0; +#endif + } else { + /* Some other trap using IST? */ + if (WARN_ON(val->ist != 0)) + return 0; + } #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */ info->address = addr; -- 2.39.5